The Middlesex Probate Court in Cambridge, Massachusetts is apparently teeming with corruption and influence-peddling. This blog will ask the hard questions.
"Because the judge here may not have understood the parameters of his discretion, we think the modification matter should be reheard....."
"The evidentiary basis for these findings is not apparent in the record, and the judge did not refer to the above submitted materials or the child support guidelines in his decision....."
"Conclusion. We vacate the two judgments of November 13, 2007, and we remand the matter to the Probate and Family Court for further proceedings consistent with this memorandum and order before a different judge. So ordered. By the Court (Lenk, Cypher & Cohen, JJ.), Entered: June 10, 2009."
3 comments:
Anonymous
said...
LOL. Another decision overturned. This time by a Pro Se litigant. As we all know, Spen knows little about matrimonial law. Time to step down Spen and focus more time on your photo hobby.
3 comments:
LOL. Another decision overturned. This time by a Pro Se litigant. As we all know, Spen knows little about matrimonial law. Time to step down Spen and focus more time on your photo hobby.
No shit Sherlock, what a joke.
The joke is on the taxpayers.
Notice how silent Spencer's "backers" are now.
SJ
Spenny you creepy loser. What would your father say Spen?
Your days on the bench are numbered. You will have to step down once more information is revealed. LOL
Post a Comment